Civil Rights Commission Adopts AI Bill Of Rights Guidelines

10/22/24 09:18 AM - By Team MIRS

(Source: MIRS.news, Published 10/21/2024) As Artificial Intelligence (AI) backed algorithms, programs and data analytics become more embedded in everyday life, the Michigan Civil Rights Commission (MCRC) Monday in Alpena adopted guidelines to attempt to keep the programs equitable.

 

The MCRC used the AI Bill of Rights from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to create the five guidelines they believe should be used in the design and the outwardly facing automated systems and programs backed by AI. The resolution accepting the document was unanimous.

 

"We thought it would be appropriate for this body to develop a guiding principles document, particularly as it relates to Michiganders in the state of Michigan, and hopefully applicable to state agencies and state departments," Commissioner Luke Londo said.

 

The MCRC started looking at the implications of AI on civil rights in April. 

 

The first five recommendations would commit the department to securing civil rights in how AI is deployed to make sure the people who are protected by the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA) and the Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act would not be discriminated on any of those bases.

 

The first section of the guidelines states that civil rights should be vetted before implementation to protect people from "unsafe or ineffective systems."

 

The second is that the algorithms used should not discriminate based on the ELCRA or disabilities.

 

The third section states there should be protections built in to allow people the ability to control the personal data that is used in the systems. The data collection through AI programs should only be for the explicit reason stated for the initial collection.

 

The AI programs and systems should also be tested regularly to see if any potential bias or discrimination had developed.

 

The fourth section states that any AI system being used in Michigan should clearly state that an AI system is being used in clear and simple language. The descriptors and uses of the AI should also be explained to users.

 

The fifth section would allow for an option to step away from the AI system and use a human-powered system instead. Local and state government agencies should have it written out specifically, especially for people with disabilities.

 

The sixth section urges the creation of a new commission to oversee AI, which would consist of AI experts, AI users, government officials, people with disabilities, academics and education members to help guide further policy in the government surrounding AI.

 

The seventh section states that state, local and county governments should each make sure they are also using these policies to make sure residents aren't discriminated against because of a faulty or biased AI program.

 

The last section states that governments should also partner with the AI commission to help safeguard civil rights through legislation or policy changes that might be needed in the future.


Receive MIRS blogged articles by email each day (M-F)

Enjoying the articles MIRS' blogs?  Sign up to receive them each afternoon via email.  
Contact Email *
First Name*
Last Name*
*Required Fields

Team MIRS